Workflow readiness audit
We map the repeated human work, the source systems, the decision owner, and the evidence needed before an agent should act.
Founder-led AI workflow consulting
Turn repeated operations work into supervised agent workflows.
Navigic works with operations teams to discover repeated manual work, build narrow agent pilots, and keep human judgment visible while automation matures.
- No credentials on the first call
- Public or anonymized examples are enough
- Human review stays visible
- Inspectable agent activity
One repeated workflowAgent collects context. Human approves action.
Evidence source: public repo and support examples
Operator decision: approve, edit, or reject
Tool boundary: read first, write only after review
First-call boundary
Use public, synthetic, or anonymized examples to find a workflow worth piloting before sharing production access.
Services
Start where the work is already repeated.
The engagement is not a generic agent demo. It is a practical search for one workflow where human operators already spend time gathering context, making judgments, and repeating the same steps.
Agent workflow pilot
We build a narrow pilot around one real workflow, with tool calls, logs, review points, and a clear rollback path.
Managed improvement loop
We watch what fails, turn operator judgment into better prompts or product changes, and expand only when the workflow proves useful.
Method
Automation comes after manual work is understood.
Observe the manual workflow
Start with how work actually happens today: inboxes, spreadsheets, GitHub, Slack, CRM notes, approvals, exceptions, and handoffs.
Choose one repeatable wedge
Pick a workflow with enough repetition, enough evidence, and a human owner who can tell whether the result is useful.
Put the agent behind review
Use the agent to collect context, draft actions, call approved tools, and expose reasoning without pretending every step is safe to automate.
Measure operator leverage
Evaluate saved time, missed context, review burden, escalation quality, and whether the team would ask for the workflow again.
Source evidence namedTool boundaries documentedReview decisions loggedFailure cases trackedExpansion earned from operator feedback
Next step
Bring one workflow that wastes operator time.
We will scope the sources, tools, review boundary, failure cases, and first useful pilot before deciding what should be automated.
FAQ
Practical questions before a workflow interview
What kind of company is Navigic now?
Navigic is a founder-led FDE, agent, and AI consulting studio. We work close to operators, find repeated workflows, and build supervised agent systems around real work.
Is this a chatbot or a product subscription?
The public website is now a service entrypoint. Existing software surfaces still exist, but a new buyer should start with a workflow interview instead of choosing a plan.
What do you need on the first call?
Bring one repeated workflow, the tools involved, an example input, the current human decision, and the mistake that would make automation unacceptable. No private credentials are required.
Where do agents help first?
They usually help with context gathering, evidence checks, draft preparation, tool-call execution behind approval, and activity logs that make work reviewable.
What do you avoid?
We avoid broad AI transformation claims, unsupervised production changes, and automation ideas that have not first been proven as repeated human work.